by Carolyn Chu, MD, MSc, AAHIVS, AAHIVM Chief Medical Officer
February 25, 2025
White E, Kityo C, Spyer MJ, et al. Virological outcomes and genotypic resistance on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy versus standard of care in children and adolescents: a secondary analysis of the ODYSSEY trial. Lancet HIV. 2025 Feb 17:S2352-3018(24)00155-3. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00155-3.
This study details virologic and resistance outcomes in the combined population of ODYSSEY participants, namely children starting first-line ART (ODYSSEY A) and second-line therapy after treatment failure (ODYSSEY B). Data were available for 788 participants: 189 in the dolutegravir ODYSSEY A group vs. 192 receiving standard of care (SOC), and 202 in the dolutegravir ODYSSEY B group vs. 205 receiving SOC. Median prior ART exposure in ODYSSEY B was 5.3 years, with 96% previously on NNRTI-based regimens. NRTI backbones were balanced across groups: ABC/3TC was most commonly used, followed by TDF/XTC, then ZDV/3TC. Overall, 51/391 (13%) had virologic failure by 96 weeks in the dolutegravir group vs. 86/397 (22%) receiving SOC (p=0.0011). Baseline resistance tests were available for 71% of ODYSSEY B participants, with 92% having high-level resistance to XTC, 29% to ABC, 4% to TDF, and 2% to ZDV. Among ODYSSEY B participants receiving dolutegravir, failure was higher in children starting ZDV (HR 2.22, p=0.048). Of the total 137 participants with failure by week 96, resistance testing after failure was available for RT and PR in 133/137 and for INI in 42/51 receiving dolutegravir. None of the participants receiving first-line dolutegravir had emergent major INSTI resistance. Five participants receiving second-line dolutegravir had at least one major INSTI mutation after failure (Q148Q/R, Q148K, N155N/H, G118R/S, G118G/R/S+R263R/K—all with cabotegravir cross-resistance).
Author’s Commentary:
These findings further highlight the role of dolutegravir for use as both first- and second-line pediatric HIV treatment. Among 51 participants experiencing virologic failure on dolutegravir, 30/51 (59%) resuppressed without treatment modification, suggesting that improved adherence may be sufficient in some cases. For children on second-line dolutegravir, the lower rate of virologic failure among children on ABC or TDF (compared to ZDV) also helps shed light on the issue of NRTI backbone optimization among treatment experienced children, given limited availability of resistance testing in resource limited settings.
View archived Clinical Research Update entries here.