by Carolyn Chu, MD, MSc, AAHIVS, AAHIVM Chief Medical Officer
December 30, 2025
McDonell CC, Assaf R, McKinney J, et al. Assessment of RNA at SVR4 and treatment completion as alternative measures of hepatitis C cure for people who inject drugs. Open Forum Inf Dis. 2025 Dec 19. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf737.
NOW (No One Waits) Study investigators assessed the concordance of SVR12 with SVR4, as well as at treatment completion, in clinical trial participants with a history of injection drug use who received 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir via a community-based, “test and treat” model. Sixty-nine participants who completed the SVR12 study visit were included in this primary analysis: 67% identified as male, median age was 49 years, 83% had injected drugs in the past year, and 55% had slept outside in the past year. Thirty-six (52%) had genotype 1a, 6 (9%) had genotype 1b, 5 (7%) had genotype 2, and 16 (23%) had genotype 3. Five participants (7%) had FIB-4 score greater than 3.25. 27 (39%) completed 90% of the 84-dose regimen and 42 (61%) did not; 6 participants were lost to follow-up. 58 participants (84%) attained SVR12 and 5 did not; in 2 of these 5 cases, HCV RNA detected in the sample collected at the SVR12 visit had a genotype inconsistent with pre-treatment testing (suggesting potential reinfection). The positive predictive value of SVR4 for SVR12 was 100% (38/38) and negative predictive value was 100% (1/1).
Author’s Commentary:
This brief report helps affirm the AASLD’s updated “Hepatitis C Point of Care Test and Treat Algorithm” (released early 2025) that identified SVR4 as an alternative treatment endpoint to measure whether HCV cure was achieved or not among treatment-naïve individuals without cirrhosis. Among NOW Study participants (which included a small number of individuals with genotype 3 and a small number with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis as indicated by FIB-4) engaged in HCV treatment in a community setting, both the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of HCV RNA measured at treatment completion (EOT) and at SVR4 had strong concordance with SVR12.
Disclaimer: Although employed at the same institution as several of the NOW Study investigators, Dr. Chu was not involved in this research and has no financial relationship with its investigators.
View archived Clinical Research Update entries here.